Smith v. Smith

431 So. 2d 726, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 So. 2d 1223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1983·No. No. 82-1883·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed with prejudice a counterclaim to modify a foreign judgment which was the subject matter of a proceedings to domesticate.

Pending the domestication of the foreign judgment, it would have been appropriate for the trial judge to either abate proceedings on the counterclaim to modify or to dismiss it without prejudice. Sackler v. Sackler, 47 So.2d 292 (Fla.1950); Smith v. Smith, 197 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Fischbach v. Fischbach, 112 So.2d 880 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959).

It should not have been dismissed with prejudice and we therefore modify the order of dismissal by striking “with prejudice” and inserting in lieu thereof, “without prejudice”.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 431 So. 2d 726, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20779 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

431 So. 2d 726 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sackler v. Sackler
47 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Fischbach v. Fischbach
112 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Smith v. Smith
197 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)