Smith v. Smith

1 Root 349
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

SciRE Eacias against said Nathaniel as agent, factor and debtor to William Cater. In this case, the court determined, that a sum of money ordered to be paid to the wife upon a divorce from her husband, was recoverable out of his estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 1 Root 349 (Colo. 1792).

1 Root 349 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrison v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.
162 A.2d 182 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1960)
Martin v. Martin
11 S.E. 12 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1890)
Knapp v. Knapp
134 Mass. 353 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Anonymous
12 Abb. N. Cas. 160 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Pearson v. Darrington
32 Ala. 227 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)