Smith v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Smith

114 F. App'x 590

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 13, 2004·No. No. 04-6649·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Ben Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Smith, No. CA-04-172-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Ben Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Smith, No. CA-04-172-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Smith v. Smith, 114 F. App'x 590 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

114 F. App'x 590 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related