Smith v. Smith
This text of Smith v. Smith (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6649
JAMES BEN SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM SMITH, Sheriff of Lenoir County and the Manicipality of Lenoir County; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-172-5-BO)
Submitted: September 20, 2004 Decided: December 13, 2004
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Ben Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Ben Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Smith, No.
CA-04-172-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ca4-2004.