Smith v. Smith
Opinion
The summary judgment in favor of the insurer, Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., and its agent, J.D. Smith, and against the plaintiffs, Roxanne Smith and Dewey W. Smith, as tenants of the insured, Shirley J. Routh, is hereby affirmed on the authority of Armstrong v. Aetna Ins.Co.,
As to the cross-appeal, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendants' motions for sanctions and for attorney fees pursuant Ala. Code 1975, §§
AFFIRMED AS TO THE APPEAL; AFFIRMED AS TO THE CROSS-APPEAL.
HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
551 So. 2d 1024 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.