Smith v. Smith
This text of 75 So. 955 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The appellant did not file his claim of exemptions in the office of the judge of probate before the levy of the execution as provided by section 4168 of the Code of 1907. Therefore, in order to assert the same, after the levy and before the sale, he had to file the same under section 4174 of the Code *Page 198
with the sheriff. The record conclusively shows that the claim of exemptions was not filed in the office of the probate judge until after the levy, and was not filed with the sheriff as required by section 4174. Therefore the appellant lost his right to claim his exemptions after the sale as he attempted to do by the petition to the chancery court. Scheuer Bro. v. King,
The decree of the chancery court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN, SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. MAYFIELD, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 So. 955, 200 Ala. 197, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ala-1917.