Smith v. Siegel
291 N.E.2d 394, 31 N.Y.2d 796, 339 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 997
This text of 291 N.E.2d 394 (Smith v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Siegel, 291 N.E.2d 394, 31 N.Y.2d 796, 339 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 997 (N.Y. 1972).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers, upon the ground that petitioner has failed, to comply with this court’s rules of practice requiring identification of legal issues presented for review (Rules of Practice of Court of Appeals, 22 NYCRR 500.9, [a], [2]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
291 N.E.2d 394, 31 N.Y.2d 796, 339 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-siegel-ny-1972.