Smith v. Shaw

22 F. Cas. 659, 2 Wash. C. C. 167
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BY

THE COURT.

There is no difference, as to the application of the general rule, between these debts, whose interest is of course to be charged, and those where the jury may allow it by way of damages; and in both, the rule mentioned by the plaintiff’s counsel is the right one. But as the plaintiff has stated it otherwise, we think he ought to be bound by it. Another question was, whether this being a sterling debt, should be turned into currency at the par of exchange, or at the present rate. The court stated thát it ought to be at the present rate, to which Mr. Ingersoll assented.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Shaw, 22 F. Cas. 659, 2 Wash. C. C. 167 (circtdpa 1808).

22 F. Cas. 659 (Smith v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Levenson
281 F. 555 (D. Maryland, 1922)
Garland v. Union Trust Co.
1917 OK 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Guiteman v. Davis
3 Daly 120 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Gunther v. Colin
3 Daly 125 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Story v. Livingston
38 U.S. 359 (Supreme Court, 1839)