Smith v. Sharp
5 Watts 292
Opinion
Arrest of judgment has not the effect of giving the defendant costs; and it would be curious if he might entitle himself by procuring an equivalent for it in the court above. Such a con[293] sequence would be an irresistible temptation to useless litigation and expense. On a simple reversal there is no award of execution except for purposes of restitution. The parties are left where they began, the case not being provided for by the statute of Gloucester, or any other which gives costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Sharp, 5 Watts 292 (Pa. 1836).
5 Watts 292 (Smith v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.
254 F. 358 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1918)
Moser v. Philadelphia, Harrisburg & Pittsburg Railroad
54 Pa. Super. 542 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Ellis v. Agricultural Insurance
9 Pa. Super. 392 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Fries v. Pennsylvania Railroad
98 Pa. 142 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1881)