Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided November 19, 2019·No. 14-982·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 23, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TESHA SMITH, * UNPUBLISHED * * Petitioner, * No. 14-982 * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Decision Based on Stipulation; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Renee J. Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Ryan D. Pyles, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION1

On October 14, 2014, Tesha Smith (“petitioner”) filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleged that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her in February 2012, petitioner suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”). Petition at 1.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. 1 On October 22, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 88). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from GBS or any other injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

(1) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased;

(2) A lump sum payment of $25,338.40, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Florida Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and: Optum 74 Remittance Drive, Ste 6019 Chicago, IL 60675-6019 Tax ID: XX-XXXXXXX

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State and/or State’s designee;

(3) A lump sum payment of $98,119.60, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Florida Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and: Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Medicaid Casualty Recovery Program P.O. Box 12188 Tallahassee, FL 32317-2188

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State and/or State’s designee; and

(4) A lump sum of $522, 882.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at ¶ 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioners’ compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora B. Dorsey Nora B. Dorsey Special Master

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

TESHA SMITH,

Petitioner,

v. No. 14-982V Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Tesha Smith ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l Oto 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner alleges that she received a flu vaccine in February 2012. On June 2, 2017,

the Court ruled that petitioner received a covered flu vaccine "on an unspecified date in February

2012."

3. Petitioner alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused her to develop Guillain-Barre Syndrome

("OBS") and that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State and/or the State's designee; and

d. A lump sum of $522,882.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents all remaining compensation for damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of$250,000,000 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company

must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;

b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa l , or Aaa;

c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA;

d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

l 0. The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract

from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of petitioner, pursuant to which the Life

Insurance Company will agree to make payments periodically to petitioner for the following

items of compensation:

a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2019).

Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a