Smith v. Scheidegger Bros.

174 N.W. 462, 170 Wis. 162, 1919 Wisc. LEXIS 17
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 4, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 N.W. 462 (Smith v. Scheidegger Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Scheidegger Bros., 174 N.W. 462, 170 Wis. 162, 1919 Wisc. LEXIS 17 (Wis. 1919).

Opinion

Winslow, C. J.

It is plain that the judgment was right. It was a question of fact to be decided by the Commission whether the claimant and the deceased were living together within the meaning of the law. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial Comm. 154 Wis. 97, 142 N. W. 271. In the present case there was ample testimony tending strongly to show that there was “an actual separation in the nature of an estrangement” for more than a year and a half prior to the accident. This was sufficient to support the finding that the parties were not living together. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial Comm., supra.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulman v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.
13 N.W.2d 403 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1944)
Stojic v. Industrial Commission
205 N.W. 795 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.W. 462, 170 Wis. 162, 1919 Wisc. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-scheidegger-bros-wis-1919.