Smith v. Scalia

136 S. Ct. 554, 193 L. Ed. 2d 421, 84 U.S.L.W. 3299, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7579
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15–454.
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S. Ct. 554 (Smith v. Scalia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Scalia, 136 S. Ct. 554, 193 L. Ed. 2d 421, 84 U.S.L.W. 3299, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7579 (U.S. 2015).

Opinion

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the only qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.".

The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice SCALIA, Justice THOMAS, and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S. Ct. 554, 193 L. Ed. 2d 421, 84 U.S.L.W. 3299, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-scalia-scotus-2015.