Smith v. Sarver

7 A. 99, 4 Sadler 289, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 882
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The mechanics’ claim, in this case, sets forth with sufficient particularity the items and amounts of the work done, and materials furnished, as also the time when the same were done and furnished.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Sarver, 7 A. 99, 4 Sadler 289, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 882 (Pa. 1886).

7 A. 99 (Smith v. Sarver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lloyd v. Morrison
15 Pa. D. & C. 777 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)