Smith v. Sambos Restaurants
This text of 430 A.2d 1121 (Smith v. Sambos Restaurants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Lorette Smith appeals from a pro forma decree dismissing1 her petition to annul an approved agreement for mistake of fact. 39 M.R.S.A. § 102. Smith suggests that Cannon v. Folsom, Me., 401 A.2d 997 (1979) entitles her to annulment as a matter of law because “the compensation agreement incorrectly states the average weekly wage.” Even if there were a mistake of fact, § 102 also requires proof that the employee’s signing of the agreement was as a result of the mistake, Cannon, 401 A.2d at 1000, n.5. Since the record supports the Commissioner’s finding that the agreement was not the result of mistake, we must affirm the decision herein. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper Co., Me., 423 A.2d 512, 518 (1980).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that the employer pay to the employee an allowance of $350.00 for his counsel fees plus his reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this appeal.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 A.2d 1121, 1981 Me. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-sambos-restaurants-me-1981.