Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Smith v. SAIF Corporation

Smith v. SAIF Corporation

256 P.3d 171, 242 Or. App. 602
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 11, 2011
DocketGBA5253 A144407
StatusPublished

This text of 256 P.3d 171 (Smith v. SAIF Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. SAIF Corporation, 256 P.3d 171, 242 Or. App. 602 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

256 P.3d 171 (2011)
242 Or. App. 602

Kevin P. SMITH, Petitioner,
v.
SAIF CORPORATION and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents.

GBA5253; A144407.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted April 12, 2011.
Decided May 11, 2011.

James E. Bailey, III, and Bailey & Yarmo, LLP, filed the briefs for petitioner.

Julene M. Quinn filed the brief for respondent SAIF Corporation.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, David B. Thompson, Interim Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Blacknall v. Manpower, Inc., 238 Or.App. 638, 243 P.3d 794 (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blacknall v. Manpower, Inc.
243 P.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Smith v. SAIF Corp.
256 P.3d 171 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 P.3d 171, 242 Or. App. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-saif-corporation-orctapp-2011.