Smith v. Sacks

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1961
DocketNo. 36775
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59 (Smith v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per .Curiam.

The petitioner not now being in the custody of respondent, Warden of the Ohio Penitentiary, the relief prayed for must be denied.

Relief denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-sacks-ohio-1961.