Smith v. Runkle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Smith v. Runkle

98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 257, 1 Stock. 257, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 451

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 19, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 98 A. 1086 (Smith v. Runkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Runkle, 98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 257, 1 Stock. 257, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 451 (N.J. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the prerogative court, affirming the decree, of the orphans court of Essex county, admitting to probate the [258]*258last will and testament and codicil thereto of William Runkle, deceased, in the form therein expressed and adjudged, is in all things affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Martin, filed in the orphans court of Essex county.

This is the case which is designated in the record as admitting to probate the first and second pages in one-half sheet of legal cap paper, as part of the will and codicil.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Gaerison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI