Smith v. Runkle
Opinion
The decree of the prerogative court, affirming the decree, of the orphans court of Essex county, admitting to probate the [258] last will and testament and codicil thereto of William Runkle, deceased, in the form therein expressed and adjudged, is in all things affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Martin, filed in the orphans court of Essex county.
This is the case which is designated in the record as admitting to probate the first and second pages in one-half sheet of legal cap paper, as part of the will and codicil.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Gaerison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
98 A. 1086 (Smith v. Runkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.