Smith v. Runkle

98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 257, 1 Stock. 257, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 451
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1916·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the prerogative court, affirming the decree, of the orphans court of Essex county, admitting to probate the [258] last will and testament and codicil thereto of William Runkle, deceased, in the form therein expressed and adjudged, is in all things affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Martin, filed in the orphans court of Essex county.

This is the case which is designated in the record as admitting to probate the first and second pages in one-half sheet of legal cap paper, as part of the will and codicil.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Gaerison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Runkle, 98 A. 1086, 86 N.J. Eq. 257, 1 Stock. 257, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 451 (N.J. 1916).

98 A. 1086 (Smith v. Runkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Shuler
132 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Johnson v. Johnson
1954 OK 283 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1954)
In Re Cravens'estate
1952 OK 104 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)
Allen v. Gidney
86 A.2d 704 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
In Re Smalley
24 A.2d 515 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Swetland v. Swetland
134 A. 822 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
In re the estate of Atkinson
115 A. 370 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1921)
Lodor v. McGovern
48 N.J. Eq. 275 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1891)