Smith v. Roueche

153 So. 490, 1934 La. App. LEXIS 600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Roueche. Read the opinion of the Court — 1934 La. App. LEXIS 598
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 26, 1934·No. No. 14608.·Published

Opinion

* Rehearing denied April 23, 1934. Plaintiff was a guest passenger in the automobile of Peter Roueche at the time of the occurrence of the accident which we have discussed in the matter of Mrs. Camille Smith v. Peter Roueche (La.App.) 153 So. 487, decided by us to-day.

In the Smith Case we reached the conclusion that defendant was in no way at fault and that the accident resulted from the condition of the roadway, and that defendant could not have anticipated such a condition.

In the lower court judgment was rendered dismissing plaintiff's suit.

For the reasons given in Smith v. Roueche the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Roueche, 153 So. 490, 1934 La. App. LEXIS 600 (La. Ct. App. 1934).

153 So. 490 (Smith v. Roueche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Roueche
153 So. 487 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)