Smith v. Rothwell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Smith v. Rothwell

246 Ill. App. 361, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 288

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 31, 1927

DocketGen. No. 8,076

StatusPublished

This text of 246 Ill. App. 361 (Smith v. Rothwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Rothwell, 246 Ill. App. 361, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 288 (Ill. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case originated before a justice of the peace and on appeal to the circuit court of Logan county, the trial resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee. Apparently this suit was brought to recover for services performed by appellant for appellee. The defenses appear to be a denial of a large portion of the services claimed, payment in full for those services which were performed, and the bar of statute of limitations to claims for other services. The abstract of the transcript of the record does not show that any objections were made to the admission of any of the evidence and sets out none of the instructions. So far as this court can ascertain, the questions involved on the trial were purely questions of fact for the jury to determine, and, as the verdict was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case originated before a justice of the peace and on appeal to the circuit court of Logan county, the trial resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee. Apparently this suit was brought to recover for services performed by appellant for appellee. The defenses appear to be a denial of a large portion of the services claimed, payment in full for those services which were performed, and the bar of statute of limitations to claims for other services. The abstract of the transcript of the record does not show that any objections were made to the admission of any of the evidence and sets out none of the instructions. So far as this court can ascertain, the questions involved on the trial were purely questions of fact for the jury to determine, and, as the verdict was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 Ill. App. 361, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-rothwell-illappct-1927.