Smith v. Rose
This text of 265 P. 800 (Smith v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal attempted to be taken by the plaintiff in this case. To prevent confusion, it may be stated that there are two appeals pending before the Supreme Court in this case. The first appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to the complaint. There was no judgment of dismissal or for costs, nothing, in fact, but the mere order that the demurrer be sustained. Several months later, the defendant took the second order dismissing the complaint dissolving a preliminary injunction, which had been issued, and adjudging costs against the plaintiff. The order sustaining the demurrer was not a final order, but left the case still standing subject to such amendment, or attempted amendment, as the plaintiff might see fit to make. So far as this order is concerned, the ease *58 is in exactly the same position as that of L. D. Powell & Co. v. Wiest, 117 Or. 18 (242 Pac. 624), decided January 12, 1926. This appeal will be dismissed, leaving the case standing upon the second appeal, which seems to be properly taken.
First Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 P. 800, 242 P. 842, 125 Or. 56, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-rose-or-1928.