Smith v. Rose

Suffolk County Court

Smith v. Rose

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 711

CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County

DecidedJuly 25, 1676

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 711 (Smith v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Rose, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 711 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1676).

Pincite

Opinion

Joseph Smith of Hampton plaint. agt Roger Rose Defendt in an action, of the case for not delivering of Six thousand foote of Merchantable pine boards to the sd Joseph Smith, or his order, at Boston, according to a writeing given under his hand at Exitor bearing date the 15th of april. 1676. by which the sd Joseph Smith is much damnified according to attachmt Datd July 8th 1676. . . . The Jury . . . founde for the Defendt costs of Court, allowed nine Shillings & nine pence the debt not being actionable in this Court.

Execucion issued 15th 7br 1676.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Smith of Hampton plaint. agt Roger Rose Defendt in an action, of the case for not delivering of Six thousand foote of Merchantable pine boards to the sd Joseph Smith, or his order, at Boston, according to a writeing given under his hand at Exitor bearing date the 15th of april. 1676. by which the sd Joseph Smith is much damnified according to attachmt Datd July 8th 1676. . . . The Jury . . . founde for the Defendt costs of Court, allowed nine Shillings & nine pence the debt not being actionable in this Court.

Execucion issued 15th 7br 1676.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-rose-nysuffolkctyct-1676.