Smith v. Roope
This text of Smith v. Roope (Smith v. Roope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
04/21/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0186
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
DA 20-0186
JACOB SMITH,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
MICHAEL ROOPE,
Defendant and Appellee.
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT Michael Donahoe, whose name appears next on the list of pro bono attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this April 21, 2020.
Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Jacob Smith, Michael Roope, Michael Donahoe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Roope, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-roope-mont-2020.