Smith v. . Rogers
23 N.E. 1146, 118 N.Y. 675, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1025
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. . Rogers, 23 N.E. 1146, 118 N.Y. 675, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1025 (N.Y. 1890).
23 N.E. 1146 (Smith v. . Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brakarsh v. Brown
162 Misc. 412 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
Drake v. Hodgson
192 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)