Smith v. . Rogers
23 N.E. 1146, 118 N.Y. 675, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1025
This text of 23 N.E. 1146 (Smith v. . Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. . Rogers, 23 N.E. 1146, 118 N.Y. 675, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1025 (N.Y. 1890).
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brakarsh v. Brown
162 Misc. 412 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
Drake v. Hodgson
192 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 N.E. 1146, 118 N.Y. 675, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-rogers-ny-1890.