Smith v. Rochester American Insurance

104 S.E.2d 822, 248 N.C. 718, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 541
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 17, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E.2d 822 (Smith v. Rochester American Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Rochester American Insurance, 104 S.E.2d 822, 248 N.C. 718, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 541 (N.C. 1958).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The purpose of insurance is to insure. The language of the policy here involved does not require and does not permit the narrow and technical construction contended for by the defendant! The evidence was sufficient to warrant the Judge in finding the issues and rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

Affirmed.

PARKER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E.2d 822, 248 N.C. 718, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-rochester-american-insurance-nc-1958.