Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co.
This text of 31 P.2d 826 (Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The same questions presented in this appeal are involved in the case of A. W. Burrill, as Trustee of the Estate of the United Finance Company, a Corporation, v. Robert Marsh & Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Robert Marsh, this day decided (ante, p. 101 [31 Pac. (2d) 823]). Inasmuch as counsel are the same in each case, it will serve no useful purpose to set forth in this opinion the considerations and conclusions which are dealt with in detail in the opinion filed in Burrill v. Robert Marsh & Co., Inc., and Robert Marsh. For the same reasons therein set forth the judgment in this case must be sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Stephens, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 18, 1934.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 P.2d 826, 138 Cal. App. 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-robert-marsh-co-calctapp-1934.