Home/Supreme Judicial Court of Maine/Smith v. Rines

Smith v. Rines

32 Me. 177
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1850·Published

Opinion

Howard, J.,

orally.—If the giving of the bond was a fraud, it was one of singular character, for it indemnified the intended victim. This suit is not brought upon any illegal contract. There is no ground,. in law or equity, why the plaintiff should not recover. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Rines, 32 Me. 177 (Me. 1850).

32 Me. 177 (Smith v. Rines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.