Smith v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Iowa

Smith v. Reynolds

7 N.W. 590, 55 Iowa 746

DecidedDecember 14, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.W. 590 (Smith v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Reynolds, 7 N.W. 590, 55 Iowa 746 (iowa 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Day, J.

— The abstract does not purport to set forth the evidence upon which the case was tried, but states simply that the plaintiffs introduced documentary and record evidence, commencing with a. patent from the United States, showing that on January 3d, 1879, they were the absolute and unqualified owners in fee simple of the property in controversy.

The appellee files an amended abstract denying specifically and positively this statement, and alleges that the plaintiffs have not left any record on file of the evidence introduced, and that for that reason appellee is unable to supply the evidence from anything that can be found on record. The appellants do not controvert this statement of the appellee’s amended abstract, but simply submit the case without argument.

On the state of the record we cannot understandingly review the case, nor can we determine that the case was not correctly decided. The only course proper for us, under the circumstances, is to order that the judgment of the court below be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day, J.

— The abstract does not purport to set forth the evidence upon which the case was tried, but states simply that the plaintiffs introduced documentary and record evidence, commencing with a. patent from the United States, showing that on January 3d, 1879, they were the absolute and unqualified owners in fee simple of the property in controversy.

The appellee files an amended abstract denying specifically and positively this statement, and alleges that the plaintiffs have not left any record on file of the evidence introduced, and that for that reason appellee is unable to supply the evidence from anything that can be found on record. The appellants do not controvert this statement of the appellee’s amended abstract, but simply submit the case without argument.

On the state of the record we cannot understandingly review the case, nor can we determine that the case was not correctly decided. The only course proper for us, under the circumstances, is to order that the judgment of the court below be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.W. 590, 55 Iowa 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-reynolds-iowa-1880.