Smith v. Reister

45 N.E. 699, 146 Ind. 527, 1897 Ind. LEXIS 143
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1897
DocketNo. 18,078
StatusPublished

This text of 45 N.E. 699 (Smith v. Reister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Reister, 45 N.E. 699, 146 Ind. 527, 1897 Ind. LEXIS 143 (Ind. 1897).

Opinion

Howard, J.

The appellee made application at the March term, 1896, of the board of commissioners of Posey county for license to sell intoxicating liquors. The appellants filed a remonstrance against the granting of the license, and the license was refused. On appeal to the circuit court a motion to dismiss the remonstrance was sustained, and this ruling is the only error complained of. The motion to dismiss, however, is not made a part of the record by bill of exceptions or order of court, and cannot therefore be considered. Crumley v. Hickman, 92 Ind. 388; Yost v. Conroy, 92 Ind. 464, 47 Am. Rep. 156; Washington Ice Co. v. Lay, 103 Ind. 48; Board, etc., v. Montgomery, 109 Ind. 69.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crumley v. Hickman
92 Ind. 388 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Yost v. Conroy
92 Ind. 464 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Washington Ice Co. v. Lay
2 N.E. 222 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Board of Commissioners v. Montgomery
9 N.E. 590 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 N.E. 699, 146 Ind. 527, 1897 Ind. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-reister-ind-1897.