Smith v. Reilly

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Reilly

240 F. App'x 602

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2007·No. 07-6498·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his motion for an unredacted copy of the record at government expense in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Reilly, No. 6:05-cv-03426-HFF (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *603 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his motion for an unredacted copy of the record at government expense in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Reilly, No. 6:05-cv-03426-HFF (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *603 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Reilly, 240 F. App'x 602 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

240 F. App'x 602 (Smith v. Reilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related