Smith v. Reeder

371 So. 2d 718, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1979·No. No. 78-2045·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff is from a summary final judgment for the defendants. We reverse upon a holding that it [719] does not appear as a matter of law that the defendants are entitled to a judgment. See Harrison v. McCourtney, 148 So.2d 53, 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).

It is unclear from the complaint whether the plaintiff is attempting to allege a cause of action for malicious prosecution or false imprisonment, but lack of clarity is not a basis for summary judgment. We simply hold that it does not conclusively appear that the facts brought before the trial judge were sufficiently settled and crystallized so that it can be said that the plaintiff does not have a cause of action. Cf. Bess v. 17545 Collins Avenue, Inc., 98 So.2d 490, 492 (Fla.1957). Accordingly, the summary final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Reeder, 371 So. 2d 718, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

371 So. 2d 718 (Smith v. Reeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boucher v. First Community Bank
626 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Mississippi State Tax Commission v. 3300 Corp.
515 So. 2d 912 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1987)
Williams v. Bay Hosp., Inc.
471 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Nazareth v. Herndon Ambulance Serv.
467 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)