Smith v. Rasar

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Steven M. Smith, ) C/A No. 0:20-3616-HMH-PJG ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER Captain Rasar; Lt. Thomas; Cpl. Hall; Deputy ) Priester; Deputy Linda Cook, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff Steven M. Smith, a self-represented state pretrial detainee, filed this civil rights action on October 15, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) By order issued December 1, 2021, the court provided Plaintiff an opportunity to submit the documents necessary to bring the case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period would subject the case to dismissal. Plaintiff did not respond to the Order and the time for response has lapsed. Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court. Therefore, the case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Henry M. Herlong, Jr. Senior United States District Judge February 5, 2021 Greenville, South Carolina NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.