Smith v. Ragsdale

36 Ark. 297
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 Ark. 297 (Smith v. Ragsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Ragsdale, 36 Ark. 297 (Ark. 1880).

Opinion

PIarrison, J.

Ragsdale recovered judgment, before a justice of the peace, against Smith, for the possession of a pony, but if not delivered, for forty dollars, its value, and twelve dollars and fifty cents, damages for its detention.

An execution was issued on the judgment, and levied on personal property, and the defendant filed with the justice a schedule of property claimed by him as exempt from execution, including that levied on, and asked a supersedeas against the sale. The justice refused to issue a supersedeas, and from such refusal the defendant appealed to the circuit court — giving an appeal-bond with Uauner and Kline as his sureties therein.

The circuit court affirmed the action of the justice in refusing to issue the supersedeas, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant and said Uauner and Kline for fifty-two dollars and fifty cents — the amount of the value of the pony and the damages for its detention.

The defendant and Uauner and Kline appealed to this court.

As the execution was not issued for the collection of a debt due by contract, the-defendant was not entitled to the exemption claimed. Cons., Art. IX, sec. 1.

And there could be no appeal from the refusal of the justice to issue the supersedeas. The issuance of a supersedeas, in such a case, is a mere ministerial duty, and the performance of it, when properly required, can only be enforced by mandamus. But' as there could be no appeal, the circuit court had no jurisdiction, and its judgment was coram non judice, and void.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowser Furniture Co. v. Johnson
175 S.W. 516 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Shelby v. Ziegler
1908 OK 259 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Gutierrez v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Curran
79 P. 299 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1905)
Reeves v. Reeves
51 S.W. 1079 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Ark. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-ragsdale-ark-1880.