Smith v. Purnell

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Purnell

475 F. App'x 464

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2012·No. No. 12-1490·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Gayle Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to amend her civil complaint, dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Purnell, No. 1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD, 2011 WL 6140868 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011) & 2012 WL 948411 (Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Gayle Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to amend her civil complaint, dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Purnell, No. 1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD, 2011 WL 6140868 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011) & 2012 WL 948411 (Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Purnell, 475 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

475 F. App'x 464 (Smith v. Purnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.