Smith v. Purdy

1 Root 129
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1789·Published

Opinion

Judgment —• That the defendant does owe the plaintiff, etc. and that he recovered the principal of the debt. But the interest resting upon a parol agreement of more than three years’ standing is barred by the Statute against Frauds and Perjuries.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Purdy, 1 Root 129 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

1 Root 129 (Smith v. Purdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.