Smith v. Public Service Railway Co.
132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 724, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 239
Opinion
Tlie judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Public Service Railway Co., 132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 724, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 923 (Smith v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.