Smith v. Prior
9 Wend. 498
Opinion
By the Court,
The defendants should have accepted the plaintiff’s offer, and were bound to do so, unless ■. it was impossible for them to have prepared for trial on short notice. This is not even now offered as an excuse, and we [499] cannot but perceive that the sole object of the defendants is delay. This motion therefore is denied, and such will be our order in all similar cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Prior, 9 Wend. 498 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).
9 Wend. 498 (Smith v. Prior) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Garlock v. Dunkle
22 Wend. 615 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)