Smith v. Presha

145 So. 839, 107 Fla. 588
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Presha. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Fla. 1272
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 9, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Presha, 145 So. 839, 107 Fla. 588 (Fla. 1933).

145 So. 839 (Smith v. Presha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.