Smith v. Postal Service

310 F. App'x 932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2008
DocketNo. 07-1818
StatusPublished

This text of 310 F. App'x 932 (Smith v. Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Postal Service, 310 F. App'x 932 (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude dismissal was proper. We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hastings v. Wilson
516 F.3d 1055 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-postal-service-ca8-2008.