Smith v. Postal Service

Eighth Circuit

Smith v. Postal Service

310 F. App'x 932

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2008·No. No. 07-1818·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude dismissal was proper. We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude dismissal was proper. We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Smith v. Postal Service, 310 F. App'x 932 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

310 F. App'x 932 (Smith v. Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related