Smith v. Porter
5 Ind. 429
Opinion
Case for slanderous words. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
The record does not purport to contain all the evidence.
Elder v. Robins, 2 Ind. 210.—Montgomery v. Doe d. Pearson, 4 Ind. 266. And even if it did, the party moving for a new trial superseded that motion by a motion in arrest of judgment. Rogers v. Maxwell, 4 Ind. 243.—Bepley v. The State, id. 264.
We see nothing in the record which the latter motion would reach.
Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Porter, 5 Ind. 429 (Ind. 1854).
5 Ind. 429 (Smith v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grider v. Scharf
73 N.E.2d 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1947)
Yazel v. State
84 N.E. 972 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Case
23 N.E. 797 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)