Smith v. Porter

Indiana Supreme Court

Smith v. Porter

5 Ind. 429

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 Ind. 429 (Smith v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Porter, 5 Ind. 429 (Ind. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Stuart, J.

Case for slanderous words. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The record does not purport to contain all the evidence.

Elder v. Robins, 2 Ind. 210.—Montgomery v. Doe d. Pearson, 4 Ind. 266. And even if it did, the party moving for a new trial superseded that motion by a motion in arrest of judgment. Rogers v. Maxwell, 4 Ind. 243.—Bepley v. The State, id. 264.

We see nothing in the record which the latter motion would reach.

Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stuart, J.

Case for slanderous words. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The record does not purport to contain all the evidence.

Elder v. Robins, 2 Ind. 210.—Montgomery v. Doe d. Pearson, 4 Ind. 266. And even if it did, the party moving for a new trial superseded that motion by a motion in arrest of judgment. Rogers v. Maxwell, 4 Ind. 243.—Bepley v. The State, id. 264.

We see nothing in the record which the latter motion would reach.

Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ind. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-porter-ind-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack