Smith v. Police Jury of Claiborne Parish

51 So. 701, 125 La. 724, 1910 La. LEXIS 541
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 3, 1910·No. No. 17,673·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

LAND, J.

Plaintiffs, taxpayers of ward 7, Claiborne parish, sue to annul a special tax election called and held to ascertain the wishes of the property taxpayers of said ward relative to granting aid to the Shreveport & Northeastern Railway Company in the construction of its line from Homer to Shreveport.

The said election was contested on several grounds of alleged nullity and unconstitutionality.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiffs annulling said election. The railway company has appealed.

Motion to Dismiss.

The suggestion that this appeal should be dismissed, because the police jury has not appealed, is without force, as that defendant is before us as an appellee. Guy v. McDuffie, 123 La. 641, 49 South. 222.

Whether the judgment can be disturbed as between the plaintiffs and the police jury is another question. The motion is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Police Jury of Claiborne Parish, 51 So. 701, 125 La. 724, 1910 La. LEXIS 541 (La. 1910).

51 So. 701 (Smith v. Police Jury of Claiborne Parish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Langridge v. Harris
138 So. 2d 197 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Schultz v. Police Jury, Tangipahoa Parish
199 So. 215 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1940)
Cambre v. Brignac
140 So. 702 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Perez v. Cognevich
100 So. 444 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1924)
Elkins v. Board of School Directors
70 So. 99 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Turregano v. Whittington
61 So. 525 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)