Smith v. Plaza Transportation Ambulance Service

243 A.D.2d 555, 665 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 555 (Smith v. Plaza Transportation Ambulance Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Plaza Transportation Ambulance Service, 243 A.D.2d 555, 665 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rungs County (Barron, J.), dated March 14, 1997, as granted, in part, the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars upon condition that the plaintiff provide certain additional disclosure items.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff’s motion is denied.

The plaintiff made the instant motion to amend her bill of particulars to assert new injuries. While leave to amend a bill of particulars is to be freely given in the absence of prejudice or surprise, when leave to amend a bill of particulars is sought on the eve of trial, judicial discretion should be exercised in a discreet, circumspect, prudent, and cautious manner (see, Kyong Hi Wohn v County of Suffolk, 237 AD2d 412; Volpe v Good Samaritan Hosp., 213 AD2d 398; see also, Daud v Forest & Garden Apts. Co., 178 AD2d 578). Moreover, when there has been an inordinate delay in seeking to amend to include a new injury, the plaintiff must establish a reasonable excuse for the delay and submit an affidavit to establish the merits of the proposed amendment (see, Volpe v Good Samaritan Hosp., supra; Simino v St. Mary’s Hosp., 107 AD2d 800).

The plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse for her inordinate delay in seeking to add new injuries, and the plaintiff’s medical affidavit failed to sufficiently establish a nexus between the new injuries and the plaintiff’s accident. Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its [556]*556discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve an amended bill of particulars (see, Kyong Hi Wohn v County of Suffolk, supra). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nieto v. Deveau
51 Misc. 3d 1027 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2016)
Green v. New York City Housing Authority
81 A.D.3d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Delahaye v. Saint Anns School
40 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Mercado v. Moss
35 A.D.3d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Andre-Long v. Verizon Corp.
31 A.D.3d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Dahlin v. Paladino
14 A.D.3d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Arguinzoni v. Parkway Hospital
14 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Hastie v. Midway Nursing Home
8 A.D.3d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Fuentes v. City of New York
3 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Spada v. Sepulveda
306 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Wittus v. Dodge
305 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Romanello v. Jason
303 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Torres v. Educational Alliance, Inc.
300 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Dalrymple v. Koka
295 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Danne v. Otis Elevator Corp.
276 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Barrera v. City of New York
265 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Razenson v. Germann
261 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Weather v. North American Recycling Corp.
255 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Holder v. Bowery Savings Bank, Inc.
250 A.D.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D.2d 555, 665 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-plaza-transportation-ambulance-service-nyappdiv-1997.