Smith v. Pittsburgh Police Department
517 U.S. 1213, 116 S. Ct. 1835, 134 L. Ed. 2d 939, 64 U.S.L.W. 3779, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3350
Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Pittsburgh Police Department, 517 U.S. 1213, 116 S. Ct. 1835, 134 L. Ed. 2d 939, 64 U.S.L.W. 3779, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3350 (1996).
517 U.S. 1213 (Smith v. Pittsburgh Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Ex Rel. Ladas v. Exelis, Inc.
824 F.3d 16 (Second Circuit, 2016)
United States ex rel. Takemoto v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
157 F. Supp. 3d 273 (W.D. New York, 2016)
United States ex rel. Osmose, Inc. v. Chemical Specialties, Inc.
994 F. Supp. 2d 353 (W.D. New York, 2014)
In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam Litigation
221 F.R.D. 318 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Mruz v. Caring, Inc.
991 F. Supp. 701 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare Corporation
125 F.3d 899 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Hlthcar
Fifth Circuit, 1997
US Ex Rel. Pogue v. American Healthcorp., Inc.
977 F. Supp. 1329 (M.D. Tennessee, 1997)
State ex rel. Mueller v. Walgreen Corp.
175 F.R.D. 631 (N.D. California, 1997)
Daniel Chill v. General Electric Company
101 F.3d 263 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Chill v. General Electric Co.
101 F.3d 263 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States Ex Rel. DeCarlo v. Kiewit/AFC Enterprises, Inc.
937 F. Supp. 1039 (S.D. New York, 1996)
United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. Straus
931 F. Supp. 248 (S.D. New York, 1996)