Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.

361 F.2d 219, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2344
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 3, 1966·No. No. 15773·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought by appellants against their employer and union under 29 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. We have fully reviewed the record and affirm the judgment of the district court on the excellent opinion of Judge Rosenberg, 245 F.Supp. 864 (W.D.Pa., 1965).

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co., 361 F.2d 219, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2344 (3d Cir. 1966).

361 F.2d 219 (Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related