Smith v. Pierce
15 Ind. 210, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 356
Opinion
Suit to foreclose a mortgage payable in - installments, but where the installments were all due.
The Court did not inquire as to the susceptibility of division of the mortgaged premises. The case did not require ■such inquiry of the Court. Harris v. Makepeace, 13 Ind. 560.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Pierce, 15 Ind. 210, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 356 (Ind. 1860).
15 Ind. 210 (Smith v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shotts v. Boyd
77 Ind. 223 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Piel v. Brayer
30 Ind. 332 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1868)