Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.

224 A.D. 769
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Upon the agreed statement of facts, it is adjudged that plaintiff is entitled to a lien upon the truck in question for the sum of twenty-two dollars and forty-one cents, with interest from November 30, 1927, and that the proceeds of the sale of said truck to satisfy said lien over and above such amount shall be paid to the corporate defendant. We are of opinion that, under the amendment to section 184 of the Lien Law, effective April 15, 1926, the plaintiff, by permitting the truck to go out of his possession on November 30, 1927, lost his lien for goods sold and delivered and for services rendered Carpenter except for the period of thirty days immediately preceding November 30, 1927. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp., 224 A.D. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 769 (Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yellow Manufacturing Credit Corp. v. Horowitz
166 Misc. 251 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Pacific States Finance Corp. v. Freitas
113 Cal. App. 757 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
C. I. T. Corp. v. Schubert
137 Misc. 514 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1930)