Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.

224 A.D. 769
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 224 A.D. 769 (Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp., 224 A.D. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Upon the agreed statement of facts, it is adjudged that plaintiff is entitled to a lien upon the truck in question for the sum of twenty-two dollars and forty-one cents, with interest from November 30, 1927, and that the proceeds of the sale of said truck to satisfy said lien over and above such amount shall be paid to the corporate defendant. We are of opinion that, under the amendment to section 184 of the Lien Law, effective April 15, 1926, the plaintiff, by permitting the truck to go out of his possession on November 30, 1927, lost his lien for goods sold and delivered and for services rendered Carpenter except for the period of thirty days immediately preceding November 30, 1927. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yellow Manufacturing Credit Corp. v. Horowitz
166 Misc. 251 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Pacific States Finance Corp. v. Freitas
113 Cal. App. 757 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
C. I. T. Corp. v. Schubert
137 Misc. 514 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-pierce-arrow-sales-corp-nyappdiv-1928.