Smith v. Phœnix Bridge Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Phœnix Bridge Co.

118 N.Y.S. 95

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 118 N.Y.S. 95 (Smith v. Phœnix Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Phœnix Bridge Co., 118 N.Y.S. 95 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs on memorandum of SPRING, J., in the case of Martha E. Bowen, as administratrix, etc., v. Phœnix Bridge Company (decided at this term of court) 118 N. Y. Supp. 93. All concur, except WILLIAMS and KRUSE, JJ., who dissent upon the grounds stated in dissenting memorandum by KRUSE, J., in the case of Martha E. Bowen, as administratrix, etc., v. Phoenix Bridge Company, decided at this term of court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs on memorandum of SPRING, J., in the case of Martha E. Bowen, as administratrix, etc., v. Phœnix Bridge Company (decided at this term of court) 118 N. Y. Supp. 93. All concur, except WILLIAMS and KRUSE, JJ., who dissent upon the grounds stated in dissenting memorandum by KRUSE, J., in the case of Martha E. Bowen, as administratrix, etc., v. Phoenix Bridge Company, decided at this term of court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 N.Y.S. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-phnix-bridge-co-nyappdiv-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack