Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 19, 2008
• Docket: 08-1959
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1959

WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP; LYNN HOLLY; JOHN T. CAHILL; BOB MARSHALL; HERB JARVIS; RUSS ARNOLD; SEAN HELSEL; JOHNS BERISFORD; TIM ROSETTI; JEFF STEVENS; PAULETTE ALIVITI; MICHAEL FOWLER; STEVE BARBERIO; JOE VODERIC; RICHARD SIMMONS; SHARON SULLIVAN; ERIC MIZELL; MIKE CORREA; JENNIFER PANKAKE; ROBERT KUENZLI; JESSE WASHINGTON; CASSANDRA ATCHERSON; YATES BROWN, M.D.; JODY M. SMITHERMAN; SCOTT KATROSH; ASHELY B. ABLE; JOHNNIE DEVINE; JOSEPH ROBINSON; JERRY ABRAHAM; IRVIN HAYNES; TOM MIZELL; MYRA HILL; ROY MILLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:08-cv-02281-DCN)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group, No. 2:08-cv-02281-DCN

(D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2008). Additionally, we deny Smith’s motion to

dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED