Smith v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.
93 A. 1005, 248 Pa. 246, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 554
Opinion
Opinion, by
For the reasons stated'in the opinions just handed down in Windish v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, and in Pouder against same company, the contention of appellant in the present case cannot be sustained. The [247]*247facts are tbe same in all essential particulars and there is no distinction-in principle between the cases.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Peoples Natural Gas Co., 93 A. 1005, 248 Pa. 246, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 554 (Pa. 1915).
93 A. 1005 (Smith v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fore v. United Natural Gas Co.
261 A.2d 316 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)