Smith v. People's Bank, No. Cv93 30 69 08 S (Sep. 28, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10664
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 28, 1995·No. No. CV93 30 69 08 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE FROM JURY DOCKET The motion to strike this case from the jury docket is granted. It is apparent from the allegations of the complaint that specific performance of the agreement is the primary relief sought by the plaintiff. "The mere claim of damages does not make the action essentially one at law. . . . The claim of damages herein appears, at best, in lieu of or ancillary to the claims for equitable relief." Dick v. Dick, 167 Conn. 210, 222 (1974). The case is an action in equity. It is not of right triable to a jury. See Burns v. Gould, 172 Conn. 210, 211 n. (1977). Malkan v.CT Page 10665Hemming, 82 Conn. 293 (1909).

THIM, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. People's Bank, No. Cv93 30 69 08 S (Sep. 28, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10664 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10664 (Smith v. People's Bank, No. Cv93 30 69 08 S (Sep. 28, 1995)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dick v. Dick
355 A.2d 110 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1974)
Burns v. Gould
374 A.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1977)
Malkan v. Hemming
73 A. 752 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1909)