Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Smith v. Pellegrin (In re Med. Review Panel Re)

Smith v. Pellegrin (In re Med. Review Panel Re)

256 So. 3d 264
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 14, 2018
DocketNo. 2018-CC-1288
StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 3d 264 (Smith v. Pellegrin (In re Med. Review Panel Re)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Pellegrin (In re Med. Review Panel Re), 256 So. 3d 264 (La. 2018).

Opinion

I concur with the writ denial in this case. We declined to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction in this case because relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. Once the district court rendered a final judgment, any interlocutory judgments, including the rulings on relator's pauper status, were merged into the final judgment and are reviewable on appeal. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 1915(B)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 So. 3d 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-pellegrin-in-re-med-review-panel-re-la-2018.