Smith v. Payne

D.C. Circuit

Smith v. Payne

22 App. D.C. 463, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5548

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 22 App. D.C. 463 (Smith v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Payne, 22 App. D.C. 463, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5548 (D.C. Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case has been submitted on the record, by agreement of counsel, without briefs or argument, because, as stated in the stipulation, counsel consider and concede that the case is not different or distinguishable from that of Houghton and others against Payne, the Postmaster General, decided by this court at the last April term thereof [ante, p. 234] and which decision must, if a.dhered to by this court, control the decision of the present case, so far as this court is concerned. An appeal from that decision has been taken to the Supreme Court of the United States; but we adhere to that opinion until reversed; and as it is conceded that the present is not distinguishable from that case, we must affirm the order appealed from, on the authority of Houghton and others against Payne, and it is so ordered.

Order affirmed.

Affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 194 U. S. 104.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This case has been submitted on the record, by agreement of counsel, without briefs or argument, because, as stated in the stipulation, counsel consider and concede that the case is not different or distinguishable from that of Houghton and others against Payne, the Postmaster General, decided by this court at the last April term thereof [ante, p. 234] and which decision must, if a.dhered to by this court, control the decision of the present case, so far as this court is concerned. An appeal from that decision has been taken to the Supreme Court of the United States; but we adhere to that opinion until reversed; and as it is conceded that the present is not distinguishable from that case, we must affirm the order appealed from, on the authority of Houghton and others against Payne, and it is so ordered.

Order affirmed.

Affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 194 U. S. 104.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 App. D.C. 463, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-payne-cadc-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack